Okay, final words on the zero waste undies

Thank you everyone who’s followed and participated in these blog posts on Zero Waste Wardrobe’s free underpants pattern. There were lots of good ideas on leg bands, gussets and bottom cover. The first post on these is here and the second is here.
Last week I had the situation of a non-zero waste gusset in zero waste full-brief undies, but Wendy, Victoria, Lyndall, @duckgoesoink and @margaretannemartin all had bright ideas about cutting the gusset with something else, specifically period pads or converting the undies to period pants.
The pieces for a pad could be cut in between two undies gussets, so I gave it a try.
It’s a good zero waste pattern cutting concept: cut it with something else and you get two things for only a little more than the fabric of one.
It worked very well.

2 pad pieces are needed, so at least 2 gussets will need to be cut.

Make the length of the towelling shorter than the pad so it won’t get stitched in with the pad’s seam allowance: cut it 1.2cm/0.5″ shorter so there’s a 6mm/.25″gap at the top and bottom when you lay it on the pad (sorry, you can’t see that very well in this photo).
I used 4 layers of (thin-ish) old cloth nappy.

Brush the crumbs off your lap, clothes, hair, machine…

I’ve missed a photo here, but the two pad pieces (one with towelling, one without) are place right sides together and seamed 6mm/.25″ around the outside, leaving a gap to turn through. Have the towelling uppermost so you can lift the corners of it as you sew past.
I rounded off the two lower corners of the pad so they weren’t so square – you can see this in the photo below.

Stitch a press stud to each side so the pad can be wrapped around the gusset of a pair of undies and secured.

Cheers!
PS – For making pads on their own, without making undies as well, I have a zero waste pads pattern here, where the pattern pieces interlock in a tessellation.
Now I see the advantage of Menopause.
Every cloud, Tracy!
A very satisfactory solution! The very neat press stud stitching obliterates any less than straight impression given by the bulky layer attachment 😉
Thank you; I feel I have closure on this particular pattern 🙂